The second is concerned with answers of similarty , also of two types:similarity in pronun ciation and structural similarity .
Chapter four concentrated on answers in dialogues . It is divided in two sections , the first is the dialogue in the Present World and it contains the dialogue between Al Bari and the prophets or Messengers , or between Prophets or Messengers and their relatives or their population , and other dialogues .
The second section is concerned with dialogue in the Hidden World which is of two types dialogue of normals which implies the dialogue between AL Bari and the Angles , Prophets and Messengers His Conversation to the goddess , blasphemers and Iblees , the dialogue between Angles and the blasphemers , or people in Heaven and people in Hell , and dialogue among blasphemeres .
The second type is the dialogue of the abnormals .
Chapter five investigated the Invocative answers and in phenomena of expressions in answers of the Quraan , It is in three section :
The first : The Clear Invocation Answers .
The secon : expression refers to the answering .
The third : is a phenomena of expression in the answers in the Quraan.
The investigation has concluded to a certain findings . From these finding is that explanation has several faces , answers can be are flection techniques of expression for all that are varied .
- From it that exegetic expression of occur immediately to the preceding context . without out any intrusive , therefor it is empty of the Instructing or any other forms of saying which precede the explanatory answers . the exegsis expression , als varied , it may occur in nominal structures whose Subject of a normal sentence has been deleted , or occure in adjectival structure , or verbal structure . It always occure with references to the Fright and Dread , glorifying this kind of answers .
Most of the negative answers except Ibrahams (blesshim) answer , were a reply for the blasphemers or the obstinates and deniers from them . Then the references of Accusing , Cynic , reproaching orgiving up occur always with them .
- And the saying of No ( roughly ) as refusal , does not agree with number of expressive texts in the Quraan which must be considered as origin insteed of others in putting the rules or meenings that the the techniques expressed .