The origin of the idea of this subjecte has been mentioned by Ibn Faris (390 H) in his book ( AL-Sahiby ) in ( the bab when its expanalation is separete from it and comes with it in the same sura or in another sura ) . After presenting number of examples from wholy Quraan, Ibn Faris states that ( this book is many in the Quraan ) , and that ( he has abook celled ( Aljuabat ) . This book is considered , as a result of investigation , as one of the rare classical book , therefore I decid to stud it for its seriousness .
My study of this subject includes the expressive side of the subject of Aljuabat . So it is inclusive for all the text of significance to this subject . Starting by the voice of the letter, when it is required by the investigation , then the single and command words and their meanings in linguistics . In addition to what is related to it , the hidden meanings whichare allowed to be used , or in the structures , or syllables , or words , when they function as subject of a normalsentence or , predicate , or subject , or object or adjective or accusative and so on . Or whether it is definite or indefinite or it is plural or singular or it has been clefted and so on . The investigation ended with the structure eith the aim of explaining the meanings and signs within it .
The nature of the study claimed that it must be divedid into introduction and five chapters . in the introduction ( the concept of Al juabat and its techniques ) has been discussed in two sections . The first is concerned with the concepts of answer , respond , and reply , the exchanges and the relationship between them , aswell as the or igin of the concept of Al juabat In the second section , techniques of answer , including techniques of agreement and acceptance , techniques of disagreement and other techniques has been discussed .
Chapter One implies studying ( the explanatory and exegetic answers) in two section , the first , is the explanatory answers , and they can be used for appearentquestion or for covernt question with vowles or other . The second secotion discusses the exegetic answers , these are exegesis for qshing context which is of two types : appearent question and covernt question . Or exegesis for telling context which is , also , of two types : related with it in the context , and separate from it .
In Chapter two ( answers of ewfusal and negation ) has been discussed in two section . The first is concerned with the answers of negation a statement and answers of negation a composition . In the second , answers of refusal , which is of two types , literal refusal and structural refusal .